In their basic level, video games are comprised of math to drive the display of every image and interaction. This is true from today’s 3D polygon-rich games as well as ones as simple as a ball bouncing off a paddle.
As someone who has grown up with the rise & fall of the “video game arcade” heyday in the early 80’s, I’ve been hooked on video games of all varieties since I was tapping away on my first computer, a Commodore 64k. I remember many of the “classic games” coming out, including Pacman, Donkey Kong, etc. And of course the eventual widespread of availability of consoles from Atari, Nintendo, Sega, Sony, etc.
But before any of that was a long history of electronics and computer science which set the groundwork in which the game Pong in the 70’s (and later Pacman, etc. in the 80’s) could be created, bringing games to the masses.
Most people may think of Pong as the first video game, since it was the first to reach a mainstream audience. However, older games such as Tennis For Two and were built even earlier for use on far less available (or in many cases, custom-built) hardware…
Does an electronic interaction device such as Tennis for Two qualify as a video game and make it eligible as a contender for “the first video game”? Or does something need to be available for sale? I would think that most patents are filed for proof of concept prototypes, thereby invalidating Baer’s claim to Pong being “the first video game” since it was one of the first to market. What do you think?
Leave a Reply